DARTH VADER WOULD BE PROUD

thinkerlarge

A round of applause please.

Aw come on, you have to admit that Germany had a pretty good crack at world domination – and not for the first, second or even third time.

Sure, I’ll concede that she’s been keeping it on the quiet like a shameful affair and that the details were shuffled under a few billion tonnes of messy United Nations compacts. Absolutely it was dusted with handshaking pleasantries before the coherency-catastrophe was wrapped up with a virtuous, bright green bow. In fairness the whole venture was nearly squashed beneath the collective weight of competing egos as they jostled for bureaucratic paper crowns. It was only a couple of accidental causalities later with blood staining the balance sheet that one could confidently say that there was a definite pass made toward a totalitarian global regime.

The European Union has been busy shedding its pacifist skin in the last few years. Whatever racy negligée it previously used to lure ailing states into the fold, it has now shattered the romantic façade and waded into the brawl with fists raised. National Sovereignty, aye? No – that’s no longer a thing. We prefer the ‘Vassal State’ pronoun these days. No – that’s not optional. Freedom is hate speech.

So, this hot mess of a modus operandi was rolled out and presented to the world amidst a crusade of love against the forces of darkness. Stay with me. As it turns out, it is possible to sell ruthless dictatorships on the coattails of peace.

‘There lurk,’ went the uninspired narrative of the Globalists, ‘dark waters ahead. Literally. Rising tides. Hell-fire and brimstone. Global catastrophe…’ It’s all a bit ‘Noah’s ark 2.0’ for those who still subscribe to a world that begins and ends at the nearest café. Does it have any roots feeling out the edges of reality? Hardly – but that’s not usually a requirement for a policy splicing DNA with a Hollywood script.

But a spade is a spade is a bloody spade…

…and this one is digging a hole right through the crust of the Earth’s fragile peace.

Usually more up front about their warmongering schemes, Angela Merkel & Co actually managed to lay a few hefty foundation stones along with a bit of the scaffolding for the palace long before seeking council approval. Heck, her friends in France were busy selling lots off the plan when the roof finally fell in and dampened the mood with a dash of popular revolt. There’s a reason the French set fire to the streets of Paris every weekend and threaten to dust off a guillotine and it doesn’t have much to do with bold, colour-blocking fashion choices.

To be fair, it really is our fault for not noticing the chess pieces moving around us sooner.

The parties involved did not put a great deal of effort into hiding their nefarious intentions – brazenly publishing most of the schematics alongside press releases that might as well have read, ‘World Domination – Part I Subsection VII’ for all the shoddy window dressing. Indeed, let’s have a look at what they got up to while the rest of us working our guts out in the real world were singing Kumbaya to the slightly drunk climate gods.

Firstly, if your goal is to create a Global Rule you need to warm everyone up to the idea of a united Earth.

This is one of those fuzzy concepts that sound innocuous at a glance on a highway billboard but has a sinister undercurrent sucking freedom out with the tide like a rip. There’s a very dark reason two generations of our fellow citizens suffered through a schooling indoctrination campaign waged on children by outcasts of the last failed Communist remainers. Taking a leaf from their successful manifesto, to steal the future you corrupt the children and so that is exactly what they did. They poisoned the young against the very concept of their nation – erased our great histories and figures but perhaps most shamefully, taught our children to spurn the freedoms their ancestors died for. For lack of a better description, it is ‘rational nihilism’.

Saddled with imagined guilt, crippled by fantasy victim-hood and robbed of the necessary reasoning skills needed to spot a charlatan, these children plunged into the vacuous world of hashtag-politics. After that, all the puppeteers needed was time – time for those children to grow up, filter through the second training camp of university and have enough birthdays to reach voting age.

There you have it – majority rule with interest from idiots.

By this point it doesn’t matter that the Globalists arguments have about as much depth as a mirage or the structural integrity of a pop-up book. All that’s needed are a few party tricks to sell the lie and a bit of duct tape to keep the contrarians from asking pointed questions. Wondering why censorship has come back into favour? It is the favourite craft of all theologies.

Cults are dangerous, particularly death cults.

If you don’t think Globalism meets that criteria, ask yourself why their chief pillar is Climate Change and their dogma is the immediate but flexible apocalypse. Come on kids, this is an old trick in new wrapping. Oh ye faithful – repent for the sins of your birth – the colour of your skin, the actions of your forefathers and your imagined privilege. You can buy your way out of this purgatory by subscribing to these virtuous mantras and donating to the temple of Climate Alarmism…

So far we have a flock of sheep, a dangerous idea and a pit of brimstone generating revenue.

What else would be handy? A bank, laws and courts beholden to no one, undemocratic jailers and a few useful idiots wouldn’t go astray…

The World Bank is like the anti-virus software no one asked for. It arrives infested on the motherboard, operating unnoticed in the background until you try and do something important and realise that your entire life is beholden to a programme you never approved of. Not only are its credentials notoriously shonky, the World Bank’s arms have taken root in the festering economies of failed nation states and dictator-run dystopias. Despite internal audits coming up with a few alarming corruption scandals it continues to house the syphoned billions from the West’s delusional ‘Climate Funds’.

Enter the United Nations Court of Justice dreamt up to keep an eye on the school yard antics of nation states. With Somalia as its president and China the acting Vice, good luck extracting anything resembling justice and yet paradoxically is also ultimately a frivolous endeavour. Like most social justice drenched travesties, everyone has spent so much time appeasing each other’s feelings that the court itself is left with no real power to dish out or enforce its rulings in the off chance that they manage to agree on anything. At the end of the day it is an expensive waste of money that buys little more than a teacher with their back turned – and that is being generous.

The CJEU – or, ‘Court of Justice of the European Union’ has a little more gusto but barely. Although it enjoys lauding its gonads with excessive buildings erected in its honour and eye-watering public servant payrolls European Law is essentially a gentleman’s agreement that asserts the right to override sovereign law but whose decisions are so mad – even by European standards – that most of the time they’re politely told to take a hike and mind their own business. As with most entities in the EU you get twice the cost, half the value with the monster separated into the Court of Justice and the General Court – both of which are so bloated under middling bureaucracy that they’re in danger of floating off like a lost weather balloon.

The supremacy (sometimes politely referred to as ‘primacy’) of European Law has the gall to railroad laws created by the citizens of those allegedly independent countries who are a bit blind-sighted by what started as a trade agreement morphing into a totalitarian regime. It’s no surprise that when the courts rekindle something pre-Bronze Age like blasphemy laws, civilised nations enter open defiance. Citizens of these great nations, who were largely unaware of the extent to which their civil power had been eroded, are starting to raise a few vocal objections in the form of referenda and protests.

However in principle – we have the framework of a global legal system.

The crucial feature of this Globalist ‘parliament’ is the lack of democratic election. Between the UN and the EU, representatives are by in large selected by bureaucrats and operate behind closed doors answerable to no one unlike the open parliamentary systems that countries went to great care to construct after learning some hard lessons from unscrupulous leaders. Without a popular vote tugging on the choker chain of tyranny, a veritable brush of self-interested career demi-gods tussle for power, anointing each other in echo chambers free from criticism.

There was a good chance that this carefully laid plan might have succeeded – at least for the European continent – if it had not been for the historical bastion of freedom lofting an eyebrow of scrutiny early on.

It’s not that the United Kingdom doesn’t trust Germany and France with the reins of power – it’s that they absolutely don’t trust Germany or France with the reins of power.

With the last – shall we say – disagreement still very much in the memory of the people, some of the ridiculous regulations being exacted upon them drew a curious eye. That curious eye widened when it discovered that, on the quiet, their politicians had lashed them to a nightmare resurrection of everything the British people fought to free themselves of in the first place.

Naturally irritated, the UK told their politicians to do their job and give the EU the flick. Other countries that had been weighing up their options revisited their exit strategies and suddenly, like an overstretched elastic band, the whole thing snapped. It became clear that the leaders of the EU were prepared to ransom, blackmail and threaten the UK while engaging in open intimidation of member states. Some of its revered leaders like President of the ALDE Group Guy Verhofstadt went slightly off the peace message when shouting, “…and that is the real problem, colleagues – why there is such a problem in this crisis – because member states are reluctant to transfer new sovereignty and powers to the European Union and we all know that the only way out of this crisis is a new transfer of powers to the European Union and to the European institutions.”

…Sure, Sparky. Countries that fought and died for thousands of years to earn their freedom are totally going to hand it over to a raging lunatic for – well – no reason. Verhofstadt is a shouty, miniature version of the worst political dregs that the European Union was designed to prevent. They’re now full swing into censorship laws to make sure any discontent is smothered by a few thick content filters. Nothing to see here… Except perhaps the smoke rising from the capital cities of several ‘peaceful’ states.

If you’re not caught up in the toxic swamps of the European Union where nations like Germany still think it’s okay to threaten Poland, never fear because you always have the United Nations and their sprawling library of anti-democratic compacts and treaties to tear apart your domestic law. Their main goal is the redistribution of global wealth and people so – as US President Donald Trump worked out in the first five seconds of hearing the marketing pitch – it’s a pretty bad idea for Western democracies. A hard pass.

Scott Morrison swiped-right on the Paris Agreement, which is sort of like agreeing to bankruptcy but not the firing squad… Thanks, bro. (Sarcasm).

In summary, what this sage swamp of detestable players amounts to is a money-making, power-building pyramid scam benefiting the elite at the expense of the poor. It was an attempt to re-establish control for the select few which had been eroded by centuries of democrat reform by our brave ancestors and it very nearly worked. If it hadn’t been for BREXIT it’s entirely possible the choke hold over democracy might have been too tight.

Ultimately, who do we have to thank for BREXIT cracking the veneer? That’d be our Globalist mastermind Angela Merkel and her colossal error. Inviting the third world to invade Europe pretty much destroyed the lies of a multicultural, globalist utopia which the United Nations were doing their best to sell. No orator in the world, however brilliant, can override lived experience. No conman can sell salt water to a sailor. Merkel made the mistake of allowing Europe a glimpse of their future and – like peeking through the gates of Hell – her people revolted. Doors slammed on all sides and the weakest members of the Globalist pack have found themselves dragged towards worrying scaffolds.

In here, somewhere, there is a twin lesson.

You cannot enslave free people without showing your hand because they can feel the chains before the lock is secured.

World domination has never and will never succeed – even with the best laid plans. Humans are tribal. It takes either extreme force or a tide of good will to maintain control and you can never have enough of either to sustain global dominance.

It’s just not, ‘a thing’ guys…

Give it up before you’re three inches deep in black plastic with a breathing apparatus and cape fastened to your shoulders.

-ellymelly

MANDATING MANNERS

thinkerlarge

I’m sorry – I don’t remember signing a ‘Global Compact’ at birth to be obliging, mild-mannered, conforming and polite toward all of my fellow citizens in every situation until the end of time. That might have been the expectation on the average woman in the 18th century but as far as mandating a culture of manners we’ve taken a colossal stumble backwards as a civilisation.

Worse, this stringently enforced philosophy of ‘avoidance’ toward offending or (heaven forbid) ‘triggering’ other carbon-based lifeforms is not born out of a desire to create a utopian metropolis… Far from it.

Let us not waste time tip-toeing around our social media censors with elaborate euphemisms. We all know what’s going on and so we shall call this movement out for what it is – censorship. Boring, run of the mill, dictatorial coercion of speech.

It is entirely fanciful to expect humans to be courteous to each other on an unwavering basis. That’s not to say that there shouldn’t be societal encouragement toward good manners in the hope of a functional peace but this is an absolute world away from the criminalising of everyday rhetoric.

Put it this way, humans are badly behaved. We squabble and scratch – are petty, moody – we lie and invent ever more creative ways of insulting each other. Speech is our first evolutionary response to conflict and our last resort before despair. Expressing frustration, fear, concern, humour, criticism and outrage is an excellent tool to avoid physical conflict. Do feelings get sacrificed in the crossfire of debate? Absolutely but it is better than actual people being rounded up and thrown onto the nearest pyre.

Words are powerful. There’s a very good reason that aspiring dictators stock up on duct tape. The lone voice of a free person can capture a nation and topple tyranny. Some Western countries had the foresight to enshrine this gift of our birth into law – others, like our great country of Australia, carelessly assumed that freedom was of such great value that no entity would ever attempt to erode it. How naive. How foolish…

You see speech is the enemy of bad ideas.

Bad ideas fear debate because their armour is comprised of fallacy which can be unpicked under scrutiny. Discussion claws at weak fabric – nails dragging until something catches and the whole carefully built fantasy unravels like a $2 sweater picked out of a discount store. Without clothes, emperors stumble about until they’re knocked from their perches usually to a good deal of cheering.

Good ideas, in contrast, are robust. They get stronger from their forging in the fire. The weight of history tells us that they shuffle up to the top, surviving even the most brutal of opposition. Consensus is just a statistic that can be overturned with time if a good idea has merit. Indeed, Western Civilisation’s crowning jewel – the Enlightenment – would not have happened if not for our adherence to the Darwinian culture of offence.

Let us not forget that it was offensive to suggest that women should vote. Triggering to the establishment that slavery was morally abhorrent. Upsetting to admit that we were apes all along. Had these conversations not taken place what possible progress could we have expected? Advances in society do not magically appear – they are thrashed out at full volume to wails and cheers alike.

Like it or not, freedom is offensive. It’s contentious, insulting, abrasive, confronting, difficult and terrifying. If you wish to be told what to think and feel, try living under a totalitarian regime. You may not agree with the party line but at least everyone’s running a unity ticket. Indeed, uniformity of thought is a hallmark of oppression and runs in complete contrast to our natural behaviour.

To the best of our ability as caretakers of the next generation, children are coddled from harm. That includes protecting them from truths, speech and ideas that they may not be intellectually ready for. Somehow the West has managed to raise a new generation of adults who believe this intellectual infancy should extend into adulthood – that consideration of their personal feelings ought to be imposed upon every other member of society. Sorry Millennials, that’s not how the real world works.

I find it surprising that a generation in love with Netflix’s violent content could paradoxically fear the Reaper of Contrary. It is as though they crave the depraved world of human truth but, in the sudden stark sunlight of their university campuses, thrust poorly spelled signs in the face of conversation – or lock their fellow students inside a debate and threaten to burn the building down whilst carrying a garrote… Don’t offend us or we’ll kill you. Make of this hot and heavy irony what you will.

To understand what has gone wrong with freedom of speech in the West it is important to recognise that there are two distinct groups at play.

The first group is the rabble – the children of the helicopter parents who were raised by surviving Marxists and indoctrinated at the teat of soft Socialism masquerading as world peace. I am young enough to have caught its beginnings on my way through school, being forced to repeat the endless mantra that we are all one people with one philosophy and countries are fictitious entities created to oppress us. A rosy sell to a preschooler who never hears the counter argument.

These children are told that they are the most important entity in the entire world – that their personal needs and well-being outweigh everything else on the planet. These demi-gods stumble into the once rousing halls of University and face the uncomfortable reality that they’re part of the pack. A standard issue homosapien who has to prove their value in the world, like everyone else who has ever lived. This is a shock but instead of growing up, they gravitate toward our second group – a group that has worked out how to prey on the underdeveloped emotional responses of our snowflakes.

Group number two are the leaders. Their involvement in the censorship ring is not incidental but imperative to their goal. If words are powerful then controlling them is a cheat way of manufacturing control of a political narrative. There is a very good reason that every good dictator – be they theocratic, communist, monarchistic or freelance – employ it. Intimidating a population into silence or acquiescence can then be used as a mandate for usurping real political positions. Without a counter argument and with criticism silenced, the new ruling class can pretend to govern – even through abject tyranny – for a period of time. Certainly this disgraceful system lasts long enough for the group to make a lot of money.

Group two exploit group one. Very smart, politically aspirational leaders bribe and coach the young into enforcing censorship. Believing themselves to be Social Justice Warriors instead of Stormtroopers, they enthusiastically sacrifice the freedoms purchased for them by the blood of their grandparents.

It is not entirely their fault that their philosophical history has been kept from them – or even that empathy toward opposing viewpoints is a blasphemy. Remember, they were raised by a carefully planned machine of indoctrination – a cult, if you will, of political ideology. This is the revenge porn of the scorned Communists. A subversive way to avenge their decimation at the end of the last century.

We should have been keeping a closer eye on our children.

Now we are faced with a generation who place no value on freedom. Who are perfectly happy to shackle the chains of tyranny not only around your neck but also their own. Hurt feelings and opposing viewpoints are capital offences despite the obvious reality that there is not a single thing that can be uttered without causing offence to someone in the world.

Not only are their demands impossible to adhere to, they are disastrous to embrace and must be rejected wholesale. No half measures – no polite concessions. Remember, nothing good ever came from ceding ground to a Socialist.

So here is my message to the fragile generation of would-be censors trawling the backwaters of twitter for martyrs and thatch:

Freedom is your birthright. You are one of the few to be born into a democracy with more scope for success and safety than any one at any point in history. You have the absolute right to express your thoughts be they ludicrous, dishonest or fabulous. As an individual, you can speak without fear of retaliation by your government. Yes, you can disagree, argue and, if you possess a strong constitution, take your ideas to the baying crowd and defend them.

You do not have the right to a life free from offence. There is no expectation of pleasantries. Your feelings are not sacrosanct and your fellow humans owe you nothing. The rule of law is there to protect your life, liberty and property – not the entrails of your mind.

If you want your ideas to have worth you must earn it for them.

Coercion is not politeness. Censorship is a temper tantrum from a child without an argument. I can assure you, snowflakes, if you bring out the duct tape it’ll be your arse that ends up strapped to the chair. You are group two’s useful idiots and as soon as you’ve handed over the reins of power, you’ll have none of your own left to save yourself.

For further reading see – the entirety of human history.

-by ellymelly

ko-fi_red

THE DEATH OF DEMOCRACY

thinkerlarge

On Saturday 5th of January 2019, Australia’s Prime Minister Scott Morrison awoke to a gift horse.

No… Not a slap-up Greek steed with a belly full of semi-naked warriors – a genuine present with embossed wrapping paper, over-sized bow, card and ridiculous balloon tied on, bobbing about for good measure.

Presumably ecstatic at this reprieve from a stricken election campaign, ScoMo stumbled out onto a mysterious red carpet that had been stretched through the metaphoric streets of Melbourne by an enthusiastic crowd of locals. At the end of this velvet river waited a line of Press dripping sweat in the Summer heat, holding iphones in place of cameras.

Amassed behind, a cheer squad of the Prime Minister’s loyalists brandished banners, wore LNP shirts – blue hats and had glitter hearts painted on their cheeks. ScoMo shuffled nervously. They quietened. His hands raised – holding their expectant gaze so long that a stray Netflix lawyer stopped to flinch. Finally captivated, the entire nation paused to take a breath as Scomo –

– shook a jerry-can of petrol over himself and struck a match.

We’ll come back to Saturday’s BBQ in a minute.

It is true to say that even the swamp-ish waters of the Garonne can blush. From their birth in the canopy of the Pyrenees, the river winds its way into France, brushing against places of famed debauchery and historical intrigue. By the time its waters languish around the pale stone walls of Bordeaux they have settled into a lake-like wound. They divide the romantic setting whose lavish farmlands iridesce against the horizon’s curve while salt rushes up the river’s throat from the Bay of Biscay, agitating muck from the bottom all year-round giving the Garonne its famed café au lait waters.

In the opening decades of the 8th Century, a different kind of tide turned.

Unannounced, an 80,000 strong horde of seasoned warriors cut their way over the choppy Pyrenees. From the South, they shadowed the beautiful river, decimating settlements before engaging in unprovoked slaughter on Bordeaux. Pure, unforgiving conquest sent a cascade of blood down the city’s stone promenades. Her people’s souls coalesced in the cracks and merged into a flood that stained the rock from pinnacle to footing. Eventually the torrent slipped into the murk of the river, mingling with the rest of the decay. Massacre turned the Garonne into the mimic of spoiled wine.

From their graves, those slain but not yet surrendered had time to watch the Saracens pick through the ruins of the city. Described later as a, ‘storm upon the land’ their weapons beat skulls and statues alike, reducing the French landscape to rubble. Bones picked clean, they grasped their swords and continued West toward the coast.

This was the barbarous Islamic invasion of Gaul – the Umayyad Caliphate which tore the religious heart from Southern Europe – plundering, murdering and raping everything they came across. It was not until 759 CE that they found defeat. Facing annihilation, Pépin the Short crushed the Muslim incursion into Europe, paying for his victory with pints of French blood. In the decades that followed the invaders were pushed back, city by city, over the mountains to their desert birth until his son (and French hero) Charlemagne finished off the job, securing the borders from terror.

This was the second of four Islamic caliphates to gnaw into the European continent. The machine of Political Islam is one of absolute conquest in contrast to the principles of colonial settlement or Roman campaigns to coax tax paying city states into the fold. Caliphates hold an absolutist standpoint. Convert or die. The ultimatum prompts a fight or flight response in kings who warily eye the dripping edge of a Saracen sword. Its previous kills are those who boasted of peace treaties and appeasements – all of which fell empty at the feet of the ruling theocracy. The foolish who tried these half measures litter the deserts of Arabia, white and cold under the sand.

Surely, thought the nobles inside Bordeaux’s dusty walls, they would be safe from this system of blood if they remained cordial with their Islamic neighbours?

bordeaux
Bordeaux by the river Garonne.

It is not true to assume that absence from the game of thrones protects you from warring ambitions. Expansionist nations in a region will always pounce upon the apathetic.

The passive might experience a moment of regret as they bleed out into the river. Where are the strong? They may ask, clawing at the mud. Where were the riders with our advance warning? The riders were cursed into silence for spreading fear and the strong were not welcome in the city so they retired to the mountain peaks to watch the savage proceedings.

Despite the tragedy, the slain of Bordeaux proved something worth learning by their deaths. The threads of civilisation are never grounded in more than a veneer of dirt. A dynasty built over a thousand years can be razed in a single afternoon and forgotten before the week is out. There is no point looking to the gods. They watch idly with no interest in whom is left to inherit the world at their feet – to them all our noise is worthy entertainment. Think then of chaos as our mantle and its force powerful enough to crack the bedrock of nations.

Sometimes the rising sun is only a sea of flames scaling the mountains and the long stretches of night are besieged cities wallowing beneath black smoke. War is where we learn peace and the blade is our tutor.

Knowing this, a wise man would never build his city over a tectonic rift or prop his house beside a smouldering scar. If forced to live amongst fire he must have high walls and keen eyes.

Australia is lucky enough to find itself at the centre of an uncommonly thick plate that doesn’t have any serious plans for the next hundred million years.

Not content with the safety of our nightmare northern swamp, the sweeping deserts lapping between coasts or even the substantial ocean moat – our politicians are keen to create cracks in the crust. Cut and bruised, our neglectful foreign policy knocks up a Facebook invite to the dozing caliphate and welcomes them over for a barbecue if only to complete a round of social justice bingo.

And so begin the scuffles. The odd glint in the sun. These are the fragments of a raging caliphate camouflaged by virtue with the paint wearing thin.

Multiculturalism is all wonderful until you run into a tyrannical monoculture with a history of terror. It is time we faced up to the reality that by in large Islam is a political religion of conquest – one that has not been dragged over the racks of civilisation like its Abrahamic cousins and forced to reform itself into something approaching civility. Political Islam’s only reformation of note is a willingness to adapt its claws to post-war hangovers, utilising the West’s perceived guilt-complex against historically naive elitists, ingratiating itself as a victim-hood poster child whilst simultaneously abusing the cultures who open their borders and wallets.

When conquest comes at us via the sword, it triggers self defence. Up we go, emboldened by fear like our fallen kin, to man the walls of the city against the barbarian horde. We’ll stand with our faces covered in mud and roar for all we’re worth. This is how Islam came at the West for 1,400 years and for 1,400 years the West survived.

Conquest by political theory is insidious.

Parasitic, it feeds off the host culture, making itself stronger until the final blow comes as an abysmal ‘tap’ on the shoulder. Once thriving cities have been transforming into no-go zones, run under parallel legal systems barely recognisable to terrified locals who have become strangers in their own country.

At first it is the torn remnants of history’s page – scratched out names and marble dust from destroyed statues underfoot. Then it’s burning libraries, online retcons and a renewed fervour for archaic terror. It becomes offensive to question and blasphemous to criticise. The moral victories of the Enlightenment are replaced by desert barbarity and even as women are segregated into a second, slave class the bravest feminist warrior looks the other way either too polite or stupid to protest the erosion of liberty.

We already stand at the point where the bookmarks of our history have been cast safely out of sight. Our leaders delight in telling us that our culture is vacuous. One might dare to argue that this is the fault of those who stoke the pyres with our history.

If Political Islam fails then we’ll see that rusted scimitar. Finally we’ll realise how close our necks have been to the blade – revolt and derail the caliphate once more.

All of this is fair enough but what does it have to do with ScoMo and his faux pas with a gas can?

Democracy is a political mutation. An absolute fluke. While it remains the only political framework to breed freedom it is also the most vulnerable to external threat. Compared to totalitarian subsets of Communism, Theocracy, Dictatorship and Socialism, the democratic behemoths of the world lumber into their sensible but slow futures.

Endurance has always been a race of the steady.

Democracy’s poster child is the Constitutional Monarchy – a ‘gotcha’ catch 22 of power that derails ambitious politicians and tyrannical rulers alike. It is unique in that the head of state has both absolute power and no power at all, useful mostly as the gatekeeper of freedom and swooning sideshow for the people. A soul, if you will, that trumps the republican system.

It is not perfect.

Democracy grounds itself in Aristotle’s observation of group behaviour also known as, ‘the wisdom of the crowd’. The merits of group theory’s application to political selection is well founded and true. On average, a random crowd of mixed ability, class and philosophical persuasion make better political decisions than carefully picked experts. There is an inherit intelligence in the ‘mob’ that defies logic except perhaps to say that competing personal interests tend to result in morally sound outcomes. There is no doubt that our devotion to the public vote is the surest way to maintain our freedom. Australia’s compulsory vote makes it even harder to manipulate the already wrought iron system.

However, there is an oversight.

Group theory works when the population is raised on the Western aspirations of freedom. The participants must value the process or at worst be ambivalent to it. Democracy is wide open to subversion when a populace can be manipulated to act as an arm of a political usurper. A caliphate is an imported theological movement that has been aware of this trick for centuries. Essentially conquest boils down to a numbers game, whether on the battlefield or the ballot box and they have the numbers.

This is Aristotle’s oversight.

He did not envisage the horror of a society brainwashed into slavery who would use democracy’s principles of freedom to shackle the chains around their own ankles or a civilisation careless enough to import a rival state. This crack in the armour is not fiction nor is it a future fancy – it has been happening for hundreds of years. Left unchecked, one day Australia will not be free to control her laws or use democracy’s mantle to save herself from the Saracen oppressor. Like Bordeaux, she will become a vassal of the global caliphate.

Some can sense the danger. The noise of discontent rumbles out of the major cities where the smoke has been seen rising for years. Scott Morrison found himself standing in the smouldering corpse of a warning fire – treading a scarlet carpet.

To his credit, the Prime Minister is a repeat bonfire survivor. Like Daenerys Targaryen he once hatched eggs in the pyre of a fallen lord but Morrison is no divine ruler and his eggs are not his children but laid instead by Labor’s cuckoo Malcolm Turnbull. Now he’s struggling to feed dragons and writing his campaign promises in charcoal.

Perhaps this traumatic experience is why he misjudged Melbourne’s disquiet toward African Gang Violence. Could it explain his continual policy of ambivalence regarding the rise of honour killing, FGM, child marriage and sexual slavery? Let us be generous and suggest it was the reason he allowed himself to be distracted by ‘Press narratives’ instead of the slow burn of citizen frustration backed by tangible crime figures.

He was gifted the perfect opportunity to open a conversation about the behaviour of certain groups welcomed to our shores who have so far refused to participate in the spirit of this once great country – to insist that the law be applied equally instead of ideologically by police more interested in thought crime and censorship than actual violence.

We are on the verge of multiculturalism becoming a separatist movement, screaming autonomy as it has done countless times across Asia, Europe and now, America.

ScoMo may as well have tossed himself from the citadel wall – attacked the advance riders and told the strong to bugger off to the mountains. They will, Scott Morrison, they’ll leave you and the rest of the political class to import votes from foreign shores and sit back as those voters gain strength and like second generation cuckoos, usurp government for themselves.

When caliphate leaders hold the balance of power in Australia, our laws are fodder.

This is how democracy dies – with an open door, blindfold and a barbecue.

-ellymelly